We have recently graphed information about the colonies. Below you will find graphs and questions displayed. You must answer the question by posting a comment in your class period post. Use only your first name.
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Period 1 Comment here on Population Pie Graph Comparison
The populations of the colonies vary from 1650 to 1750, this is mostly because of the additional five colonies which have been admitted since then. Five more colonies have been admitted to the United States since 1650, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. The colony of New York has grown 18 times in population while Connecticut has grown 27 times in population since 1650. The population of Maryland has almost tripled from 1650 to 1750. Massachusetts and Virginia are the states with the largest populations and they are two of the three largest states, geographically. This is because the state of North Carolina was not admitted to the United States until after 1650.
The populations in 1650 to 1750 are similar and different in many ways. One conclusion I can make would be that 5 more colonies had settled in 100 years. New Jersey, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia are the 5 that settled. Virginia’s population had grown over 200,000 people. Delaware which was the smallest state with 200 people rose over 20,000 and Georgia is now the smallest state with 5,200 people. All of the states have changed population throughout the 100 years. In conclusion, there were many differences throughout the 13 original colonies. ~Christina
The populations from 1650 to 1750 dramatically increase. Colonies like Virginia went up above 10 times in a century. Maryland’s population has tripled over the century. New York's population has grown 18 times while Connecticut’s population grew up by 27 times. Also 5 more colonies were added in the charts so those populations cannot be compared. This is the conclusion I drew from looking at this graph.
There are three conclusions that I can draw from these graphs. One of them is that there are 5 more states in 1750 then there were in 1650. The five states that were added were North Carolina, South Carolina, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. Another conclusion is that every state that existed in 1650 greatly went up in population. For example, Maryland almost tripled in size. My last conclusion is that Virginia and Massachusetts are the biggest states in 1650 and 1750. None of the new states were bigger than them. There are three conclusions that I can draw from these graphs. One of them is that there are 5 more states in 1750 then there were in 1650. The five states that were added were North Carolina, South Carolina, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. Another conclusion is that every state that existed in 1650 greatly went up in population. For example, Maryland almost tripled in size. My last conclusion is that Virginia and Massachusetts are the biggest states in 1650 and 1750. None of the new states were bigger than them.
The first conclusion I draw from the graph is that populations went way up from 1650. The lowest population is 5,200. Another conclusion is that several colonies were added in during the time between the two graphs. 5 more colonies were added to the previous 8. A final conclusion that can be drawn is that Georgia had just been added. This is because the population is very low for such a large colony. T.J.
I can conclude a few things by comparing the two graphs. One comparison is that there are more states in 1750 than in 1650. There was also a larger population in 1750. Some states were more populated in 1750 than they were in 1650. Rhode Island has grown at least 41 times in population since 1650. New York and Connecticut also grew in population but Connecticut didn’t grow as much as other states. These are some conclusions that I can say about comparing these two graphs.
In these graphs there are many things that you can conclude. In this graph there is a large population growth because there were five new colonies added. There are also almost 50,000 people added. In the 1750 graph there are five states with over 100,000 people. In the 1650 one there aren’t any with over 100,000. This is what you can conclude about these two graphs.
The population of the 13 colonies changed a lot from the years 1650 to 1750. One thing that is a big difference is that all of the colonies populations raised by a lot. The population of Maryland went up all most three times more than its population in 1650. The population of Virginia went from 18,000 to having 231,000 people. Also there were more colonies in 1750 so added to the population tremendously. The lowest population number in 1650 was 200 in Delaware, and the lowest in 1750 was 5,200, in Georgia. So the lowest number went up by 5,000. All of the population numbers went up by a lot. North Carolina didn’t even exist in 1650 but in 1750 there was 73,000 people there. In all Virginia had the highest population, and Delaware, New Hampshire, and Georgia had the lowest populations. Overall there are many conclusions that you can draw from those two graphs. ~Sam
In 1650, there were only eight colonies unlike 1750 when there were thirteen colonies. This is why the pie chart of 1750 has less space for each part of the pie chart. Also, back in 1750, there were a lot more people living in 1750 other than 1650. This was due to more settlers and more land becoming available to make a living in. Finally, the whole population of 1650 was less than the population of Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, Massachusetts, South Carolina, and Connecticut in 1750. This means that there were more than five times more people living in 1750 than in 1650. These are three conclusions I can draw from both of these pie graphs. -George
Between 1650 and 1750, the colonies grew significantly. Some new colonies developed, while others began to flourish. One conclusion I can make about these graphs is that in 1650, Delaware was the smallest colony. But, by 1750, its population grew from 200 to 28,700. So, all the colonies were growing. Another conclusion about the graphs is people during 1650, were just beginning to settle in the colonies. By, 1750, however, people were setting up permanent living accommodations. Lastly, I can predict that if the colonies grew this much in 100 years, they would probably grow more and more every year. These two graphs show how extremely the colonies grew.
Between 1650 and 1750, the population of the colonies grew. For example, Rhode Island’s population was only 800 people in 1650, but by 1750 it was up to 33,200 people. Also, in 1650 there were only eight colonies developed: New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. By 1750 there were thirteen, so five more colonies were developed in those 100 years. Lastly, since the populations grew so significantly in 100 years, I can predict that they will keep growing as years go on.
Three conclusions that I can draw from looking at the 1650 and 1750 graph is that the original thirteen bounded in population while the new colonies started off slowly. This is shown by the huge number differences between the years. Another conclusion that I can draw from the graphs is that if the colony was a big one in 1650, it would remain a big one in 1750. This is shown by Virginia and Maryland. One last conclusion is that in 1750 more people can to North America looking to settle down and for religious freedom. Also when more people came to settle down they needed people to work for them. These are the conclusions that I can drawn from the two graphs.
There are many conclusions you can draw from the 1650 graph of the colonies and the 1750 graph. Virginia was still the largest colony in 1750, like it was in 1650. In 1650, Delaware was the smallest colony, but in 1750 Georgia was. In 1750, Virginia had more than ten times the population it had in 1650. In 1650, none of the colonies had more than 20,000 people living in them, but in 1750, every colony had more than 20,000 people but Georgia. There were also five new colonies in 1750 that were not there in 1650.
There are many similarities and differences between the 1650 population graph and the 1750 population graph. Both of the graphs included the populations of New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Massachusetts, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. But in 1750 five more colonies were added to the population graph compared to the population graph in 1650: New Jersey, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. Additionally, the population in 1750 grew tremendously compared to the population in 1650. For example, the population of Connecticut was 27 times bigger than its population in 1650. All of the above shows some similarities and differences between the population graphs of 1650 and 1750.
The population greatly increased from 1650 to 1750. One reason is because there were more colonies and more people came. Another reason was because women came over to the Americas. A Third reason was because there were more crops to eat. This is because of the addition of slaves. Then after that they started making money from farming tobacco. This gave them money which they could trade for food. I can conclude that after the colonies started to do good more and more people wanted to come to the Americas for a new life. Connor
From the graphs of the population from 1650 and 1750 you can create three conclusions. One such conclusion is that more settlers have landed in the early American colonies. You know this because the overall population has increase drastically in 1750 than in 1650. You can also conclude that more colonies have formed. The reason for this conclusion is that in 1750 you she five new colonies that were not existent in 1650. Finally you can conclude that even though more colonies have been formed the greatest population remained to be Virginia and the smallest colony remained to be Rhode Island. Brian
The population of 1650 and 1750 are similar and different in many ways. First of all, in 1750 there are five more colonies added to the graph. Also, in 1750 there is a greater difference between the colonies’ populations. This was probably because many northern states became more populated. In 1650 Virginia’s population was 18, 700 and in 1750 it increased to 231,000. This was probably because Virginia was the first colony and brought more people in than any other colony. In both 1650 and 1750 Massachusetts and Virginia were the two greatly populated areas. In conclusion, the population of 1650 and 1750 are both similar and different. ~ Secret Squirrel
There are many conclusions I can get from the pie graph. One is that the amount of states almost doubled, it went from eight states to thirteen. The population doubled from the 1650’s to the 1750’s. It went from very small colonies to giant colonies. Another thing observation I can get out of this graph is that Virginia and Massachusetts took up almost two thirds of the land in 1650, but then in 1750 they only took up a quarter of the land. Their population was still the biggest but not by much. Lastly, the biggest change in population was probably Maryland its population went up by nearly, one hundred thousand.
There are many conclusions that can be made from the two pie graphs. First off most of the 8 colonies in 1650 doubled in size in 1750. So it shows that a lot of the states became more popular. Next, the states that joined in 1750 had smaller populations because they were newer. Lastly some of the smaller states have bigger populations like Massachusetts and Connecticut have bigger populations then Georgia and other larger states. Those are three conclusions that I drew from the two pie graphs. ~Dana
The populations from 1650 to 1750 changed in population by a lot. One reason why this may have happened is because of the addition to the other five colonies. This would have caused more people to come to that place to live. Another reason it may have gone up is because women came over and they started to have babies while they were there. This would have caused the population to go up. As it can be seen from the graph Massachusetts almost grows by nine times its size. Finally, another conclusion that could be drawn is that maybe they had slaves. This would cause them to have more food because the slaves would farm making it so they could have more people to feed in the new world. As you can see even the smallest colony Delaware went up by an amazing amount from 200 to 27,500 because of these 3 conclusions.
The population from 1650 to 1750 had many similarities and differences. One is that 5 new states were added in 100 years. The new states were North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. Delaware was the smallest colony for 100 years until Georgia came. Then Delaware had a rapid population increase. Connecticut’s population got 27 times bigger in that 100 year span. The original colonies started out very small, but then got very large as new states were discovered. These are the similarities and differences from 1650 to 1750.
From observing the two graphs I can tell that the most populated areas seem to be on the coast. His would make since because a lot of colonists made their living from fishing. I also can tell that Massachusetts is highly populated because is not only very large but it also on the coast. Other areas also the colony, New Hampshire would have been relatively unpopulated because it is very monotonous and would have been very hard to grow crops. Also It only has a slim coast line. It is obvious from the graph that the climate of the colonies affected their population. Dun
From the graphs I can tell that the populations grew from 1650 to 1750. There are many examples to prove this is true. One example of this is that Rhode Island’s population quadrupled in size. Second, Virginia went from 18,700 people to 231,000 in 100 years. Last, Delaware had 200 people in 1650 and in 1750 the population was 28,700. In conclusion the populations have grown a lot and will probably continue growing now.
The populations of the colonies were very different from 1650-1750. One difference is that during the 100 years, five more colonies were added. The other colonies also grew in population. For example, the population of Delaware, which was only 200 in 1650, rose over 20,000 by 1750. A third conclusion I drew was that the populations of Massachusetts and Virginia were the highest in both years, most likely because they were the first settled and that's where everybody went.
The populations of the colonies vary from 1650 to 1750, this is mostly because of the additional five colonies which have been admitted since then. Five more colonies have been admitted to the United States since 1650, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. The colony of New York has grown 18 times in population while Connecticut has grown 27 times in population since 1650. The population of Maryland has almost tripled from 1650 to 1750. Massachusetts and Virginia are the states with the largest populations and they are two of the three largest states, geographically. This is because the state of North Carolina was not admitted to the United States until after 1650.
ReplyDeletePaige
The populations in 1650 to 1750 are similar and different in many ways. One conclusion I can make would be that 5 more colonies had settled in 100 years. New Jersey, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia are the 5 that settled. Virginia’s population had grown over 200,000 people. Delaware which was the smallest state with 200 people rose over 20,000 and Georgia is now the smallest state with 5,200 people. All of the states have changed population throughout the 100 years. In conclusion, there were many differences throughout the 13 original colonies.
ReplyDelete~Christina
The populations from 1650 to 1750 dramatically increase. Colonies like Virginia went up above 10 times in a century. Maryland’s population has tripled over the century. New York's population has grown 18 times while Connecticut’s population grew up by 27 times. Also 5 more colonies were added in the charts so those populations cannot be compared. This is the conclusion I drew from looking at this graph.
ReplyDelete~ Tosh
There are three conclusions that I can draw from these graphs. One of them is that there are 5 more states in 1750 then there were in 1650. The five states that were added were North Carolina, South Carolina, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. Another conclusion is that every state that existed in 1650 greatly went up in population. For example, Maryland almost tripled in size. My last conclusion is that Virginia and Massachusetts are the biggest states in 1650 and 1750. None of the new states were bigger than them. There are three conclusions that I can draw from these graphs. One of them is that there are 5 more states in 1750 then there were in 1650. The five states that were added were North Carolina, South Carolina, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. Another conclusion is that every state that existed in 1650 greatly went up in population. For example, Maryland almost tripled in size. My last conclusion is that Virginia and Massachusetts are the biggest states in 1650 and 1750. None of the new states were bigger than them.
ReplyDelete-Taylor
The first conclusion I draw from the graph is that populations went way up from 1650. The lowest population is 5,200. Another conclusion is that several colonies were added in during the time between the two graphs. 5 more colonies were added to the previous 8. A final conclusion that can be drawn is that Georgia had just been added. This is because the population is very low for such a large colony.
ReplyDeleteT.J.
I can conclude a few things by comparing the two graphs. One comparison is that there are more states in 1750 than in 1650. There was also a larger population in 1750. Some states were more populated in 1750 than they were in 1650. Rhode Island has grown at least 41 times in population since 1650. New York and Connecticut also grew in population but Connecticut didn’t grow as much as other states. These are some conclusions that I can say about comparing these two graphs.
ReplyDelete~Matt
In these graphs there are many things that you can conclude. In this graph there is a large population growth because there were five new colonies added. There are also almost 50,000 people added. In the 1750 graph there are five states with over 100,000 people. In the 1650 one there aren’t any with over 100,000. This is what you can conclude about these two graphs.
ReplyDeleteRich
The population of the 13 colonies changed a lot from the years 1650 to 1750. One thing that is a big difference is that all of the colonies populations raised by a lot. The population of Maryland went up all most three times more than its population in 1650. The population of Virginia went from 18,000 to having 231,000 people. Also there were more colonies in 1750 so added to the population tremendously. The lowest population number in 1650 was 200 in Delaware, and the lowest in 1750 was 5,200, in Georgia. So the lowest number went up by 5,000. All of the population numbers went up by a lot. North Carolina didn’t even exist in 1650 but in 1750 there was 73,000 people there. In all Virginia had the highest population, and Delaware, New Hampshire, and Georgia had the lowest populations. Overall there are many conclusions that you can draw from those two graphs.
ReplyDelete~Sam
In 1650, there were only eight colonies unlike 1750 when there were thirteen colonies. This is why the pie chart of 1750 has less space for each part of the pie chart. Also, back in 1750, there were a lot more people living in 1750 other than 1650. This was due to more settlers and more land becoming available to make a living in. Finally, the whole population of 1650 was less than the population of Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, Massachusetts, South Carolina, and Connecticut in 1750. This means that there were more than five times more people living in 1750 than in 1650. These are three conclusions I can draw from both of these pie graphs.
ReplyDelete-George
Between 1650 and 1750, the colonies grew significantly. Some new colonies developed, while others began to flourish. One conclusion I can make about these graphs is that in 1650, Delaware was the smallest colony. But, by 1750, its population grew from 200 to 28,700. So, all the colonies were growing. Another conclusion about the graphs is people during 1650, were just beginning to settle in the colonies. By, 1750, however, people were setting up permanent living accommodations. Lastly, I can predict that if the colonies grew this much in 100 years, they would probably grow more and more every year. These two graphs show how extremely the colonies grew.
ReplyDeleteKristen
Between 1650 and 1750, the population of the colonies grew. For example, Rhode Island’s population was only 800 people in 1650, but by 1750 it was up to 33,200 people. Also, in 1650 there were only eight colonies developed: New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. By 1750 there were thirteen, so five more colonies were developed in those 100 years. Lastly, since the populations grew so significantly in 100 years, I can predict that they will keep growing as years go on.
ReplyDeleteAdriana
Three conclusions that I can draw from looking at the 1650 and 1750 graph is that the original thirteen bounded in population while the new colonies started off slowly. This is shown by the huge number differences between the years. Another conclusion that I can draw from the graphs is that if the colony was a big one in 1650, it would remain a big one in 1750. This is shown by Virginia and Maryland. One last conclusion is that in 1750 more people can to North America looking to settle down and for religious freedom. Also when more people came to settle down they needed people to work for them. These are the conclusions that I can drawn from the two graphs.
ReplyDelete-Lobster
There are many conclusions you can draw from the 1650 graph of the colonies and the 1750 graph. Virginia was still the largest colony in 1750, like it was in 1650. In 1650, Delaware was the smallest colony, but in 1750 Georgia was. In 1750, Virginia had more than ten times the population it had in 1650. In 1650, none of the colonies had more than 20,000 people living in them, but in 1750, every colony had more than 20,000 people but Georgia. There were also five new colonies in 1750 that were not there in 1650.
ReplyDeleteMark
There are many similarities and differences between the 1650 population graph and the 1750 population graph. Both of the graphs included the populations of New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Massachusetts, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. But in 1750 five more colonies were added to the population graph compared to the population graph in 1650: New Jersey, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. Additionally, the population in 1750 grew tremendously compared to the population in 1650. For example, the population of Connecticut was 27 times bigger than its population in 1650. All of the above shows some similarities and differences between the population graphs of 1650 and 1750.
ReplyDelete~Sara
The population greatly increased from 1650 to 1750. One reason is because there were more colonies and more people came. Another reason was because women came over to the Americas. A Third reason was because there were more crops to eat. This is because of the addition of slaves. Then after that they started making money from farming tobacco. This gave them money which they could trade for food. I can conclude that after the colonies started to do good more and more people wanted to come to the Americas for a new life.
ReplyDeleteConnor
From the graphs of the population from 1650 and 1750 you can create three conclusions. One such conclusion is that more settlers have landed in the early American colonies. You know this because the overall population has increase drastically in 1750 than in 1650. You can also conclude that more colonies have formed. The reason for this conclusion is that in 1750 you she five new colonies that were not existent in 1650. Finally you can conclude that even though more colonies have been formed the greatest population remained to be Virginia and the smallest colony remained to be Rhode Island.
ReplyDeleteBrian
The population of 1650 and 1750 are similar and different in many ways. First of all, in 1750 there are five more colonies added to the graph. Also, in 1750 there is a greater difference between the colonies’ populations. This was probably because many northern states became more populated. In 1650 Virginia’s population was 18, 700 and in 1750 it increased to 231,000. This was probably because Virginia was the first colony and brought more people in than any other colony. In both 1650 and 1750 Massachusetts and Virginia were the two greatly populated areas. In conclusion, the population of 1650 and 1750 are both similar and different.
ReplyDelete~ Secret Squirrel
There are many conclusions I can get from the pie graph. One is that the amount of states almost doubled, it went from eight states to thirteen. The population doubled from the 1650’s to the 1750’s. It went from very small colonies to giant colonies. Another thing observation I can get out of this graph is that Virginia and Massachusetts took up almost two thirds of the land in 1650, but then in 1750 they only took up a quarter of the land. Their population was still the biggest but not by much. Lastly, the biggest change in population was probably Maryland its population went up by nearly, one hundred thousand.
ReplyDelete-Alex-
There are many conclusions that can be made from the two pie graphs. First off most of the 8 colonies in 1650 doubled in size in 1750. So it shows that a lot of the states became more popular. Next, the states that joined in 1750 had smaller populations because they were newer. Lastly some of the smaller states have bigger populations like Massachusetts and Connecticut have bigger populations then Georgia and other larger states. Those are three conclusions that I drew from the two pie graphs.
ReplyDelete~Dana
The populations from 1650 to 1750 changed in population by a lot. One reason why this may have happened is because of the addition to the other five colonies. This would have caused more people to come to that place to live. Another reason it may have gone up is because women came over and they started to have babies while they were there. This would have caused the population to go up. As it can be seen from the graph Massachusetts almost grows by nine times its size. Finally, another conclusion that could be drawn is that maybe they had slaves. This would cause them to have more food because the slaves would farm making it so they could have more people to feed in the new world. As you can see even the smallest colony Delaware went up by an amazing amount from 200 to 27,500 because of these 3 conclusions.
ReplyDeleteChris
The population from 1650 to 1750 had many similarities and differences. One is that 5 new states were added in 100 years. The new states were North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. Delaware was the smallest colony for 100 years until Georgia came. Then Delaware had a rapid population increase. Connecticut’s population got 27 times bigger in that 100 year span. The original colonies started out very small, but then got very large as new states were discovered. These are the similarities and differences from 1650 to 1750.
ReplyDeleteDavid
From observing the two graphs I can tell that the most populated areas seem to be on the coast. His would make since because a lot of colonists made their living from fishing. I also can tell that Massachusetts is highly populated because is not only very large but it also on the coast. Other areas also the colony, New Hampshire would have been relatively unpopulated because it is very monotonous and would have been very hard to grow crops. Also It only has a slim coast line. It is obvious from the graph that the climate of the colonies affected their population.
ReplyDeleteDun
From the graphs I can tell that the populations grew from 1650 to 1750. There are many examples to prove this is true. One example of this is that Rhode Island’s population quadrupled in size. Second, Virginia went from 18,700 people to 231,000 in 100 years. Last, Delaware had 200 people in 1650 and in 1750 the population was 28,700. In conclusion the populations have grown a lot and will probably continue growing now.
ReplyDelete-haley
The populations of the colonies were very different from 1650-1750. One difference is that during the 100 years, five more colonies were added. The other colonies also grew in population. For example, the population of Delaware, which was only 200 in 1650, rose over 20,000 by 1750. A third conclusion I drew was that the populations of Massachusetts and Virginia were the highest in both years, most likely because they were the first settled and that's where everybody went.
ReplyDelete-Ned