We have recently graphed information about the colonies. Below you will find graphs and questions displayed. You must answer the question by posting a comment in your class period post. Use only your first name.
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Period 6 Comment here on Population Pie Graph Comparison
My first conclusion is that Virginia had the largest population in both 1650 and 1750. My second conclusion from the graphs is that in 1650 not all of the 13 colonies existed in 1650. My last conclusion is that in 1650 Delaware was the least populated state but in 1750 Georgia became the least populated state.
I believe that Delaware had the fewest people living their because in 1650 and 1750 delaware had the least population. Also I believe Virginia had the biggest population of the original colonies as it has the highest population in 1650 and 1750. Even though New York and Connecticut had the same population in 1650, I believe people migrated to Conneticut than New York because in the 1750’s it had a bigger population than New York. Mike
There are many conclusions you can draw from these two graphs. One conclusion you can draw from these graphs is that the population increased a lot from 1650 to 1750. Also, in that hundred year span five more colonies had settled. The Colonies were North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. One last conclusion I can make is that Connecticut’s population got 27 times bigger between that hundred year span. These are three great conclusions that you can draw from these two graphs.
From these two pie graphs I can tell that in 1750 there were more colonies formed. I can also conclude that the colonies from 1650 have grown in the 100 years. I can also say that Virginia still has the most population. Also, Delaware is not the lowest population is 1750. This is what I can conclude from these two graphs.
From the time period 1650-1750, more colonies were formed. All of the colonies filled with more people. Since all the colonies got bigger in population and more colonies formed, the United States became popular and more people came and settled in one of the thirteen colonies. Also, it probably was easier to work, and live in the United States. Every other country was ruled by a king or queen who made it hard to live, especially if the ruler was strict and forced you to pay taxes and demanded hard, painful orders. Marty
In these graphs I can conclude that Virginia had stayed the same as having the biggest population over the 100 years. Another thing I can conclude is that there were many more colonies in 1750 then 1650. Also that the colonies population had gone up from 1650 at least 50 percent. This is what I can conclude about these two graphs. fabio
There are a few conclusions I can draw from comparing these two graphs. First, many more colonies were started in between 1650 and 1750. Also, Virginia still maintains the most amount of people in both graphs. Also, Massachusetts still has the second most amount of people, which is weird because Massachusetts is one of the smallest states in present day. Delaware grew to nearly 150 times its original amount in 100 years! The population of New England went from 21,800 in 1650 to 360,000 in 1750. Those are the conclusions I can draw from comparing this to graphs. Lauren
One conclusion I could draw from the pie graph is that the population usually gets higher. Over the 100 years all of the colonies grew in population. Also the new states had a lot to. Another conclusion I could draw is that the very first colonies had more than the newer one. The 5 most populated colonies in the graph are the very first ones. A final conclusion I could draw from it is that combined the northern states have more than the southern states. If you add all of the populations of the northern states and then the southern states, the northern has more. In conclusions those are 3 conclusions I got.
There are many conclusions that can be made from this graph. One conclusion I can make from this graph is that many new settlers had come because there were many new states and the population had increased in the colonies that were already there. A second conclusion I can make is that Massachusetts and Virginia had divided up into other states because their population decreased. A third conclusion I can make is that Connecticut was founded after 1650 because Connecticut was not on the population in 1650 graph. These are three conclusions I made from this graph. --Taylor
I can draw many conclusions from this graph. For example, there were a lot more colonies in 1750 then there was in 1650. This also means that the population was a lot grater at this time. The population went up in each colony by at least 50 percent. For both charts Virginia remains the colony with the highest population. Many more colonies were established resulting in a much higher population.
in these two graphs i conclude that in the 1750s there were more colonies. i also see that in both of them Virginia continued to be the nlargest population. i also noticed that in the old days New York was one of the smallest colonies and now it has i think the largest population in the united statess. HECTOR :]
I am able to draw many conclusions from this graph. One conclusion I can draw is that in both 1650 and 1750 had the highest population. Also, Massachusetts had the highest populations in the two years. Finally, Georgia had the least in 1750 and Delaware had lowest in 1650. I drew many conclusions from these graphs. Ricky
There are more people living in the time period of 1750 than in 1650. Many people wanted to find new land but in 1650 many of the people died on the journey. In 1750 the boats were all travelling to different places so there could be more people on the boats so less people would die and more would survie.
Alot of conclusions can be explained using these 2 graphs. One of the is that the population in all colonies rose a dramatic amount in the 100 year span. Delaware had the least amount of people in 1650 and 1750. It probably wasn't discovered as fast as all the other colonies. Viginia was the most populated out of all the colonies. This is probably because of the settlers in Jamestown. It might have also boomed because of the search of gold. Those are my conclusions of these 2 graphs.
There are many conclusions I can draw from these two population graphs. One conclusion I can draw is that over the course of one hundred years, Massachusetts has stayed one of the most populated areas. New Hampshire was one of the smallest populated area throughout one hundred years. New York and Connecticut both had the same population in 1650, but in 1750 Connecticut ahs a bigger population. These are some of the conclusions I have drawn while looking at this graph. Alyssa
You can tell many things from both graphs. One change you can tell is how much the population went up. For example, Delaware used to have the smallest population with 200 in the 1650s’, in the 1750s’ it had 28,700 for its population, that’s a 28,500 difference! In the 1750s’, Georgia has the smallest population and Virginia had the largest, in the 1650s’, Georgia wasn’t even in the 13 colonies. Also, more colonies were added on. Those are a few things you can tell from the graphs.
There are many conclusions that can be drawn from the colonies population in 1650 and 1750.One obvious conclusion that can be drawn is that 100 years after 1650 they founded more states. This happened because the population starting growing so it got crowded and they figured out they needed more room. They also did because over time they probably got braver. Another conclusion you can draw is that the population increased greatly. This happened because they were thriving greatly. Also more and more colonials kept coming to the new world. Hannah
I can draw many conclusions from these two graphs. For example, in 1750 many more people must have come to the “New World” because many new states were formed. Maybe this happened because the farming as so good here. Also, Massachusetts had the second most populated state in 1750 so maybe many people settled here because it was freer than the southern states; they could probably follow their own religion there. I think Virginia was the most populated state in 1750 because it had the best farming area. There are so many conclusions I could draw from this graph. Katie
One conclusion I can make from these two graphs is that in 1650 Connecticut and New York had equal population but in 1750 New York increased is population even more then Connecticut did. Also by the 1750’s seven more colonies were added that had not been there in the past. One conclusion I can get from comparing the two graphs is that in both graphs Virginia had the largest population. MADDIE
Three conclusion’s that I can make are both graphs were at its highest population. Second conclusion I can make is that Virginia is at its highest population in both graphs. Last conclusion is that Georgia is the lowest out of all the states. -JoE
There are many comparisans you can make between the 1650s and 1750s. There were a lot more people in the 1750 than the 1650. Virginia still had the largest populationin the 1650 to the 1750. The population more than doubled in the 100 years. Every state atleast doubled .Those are all the comparisans. riley
There are many conclusions you can draw from the population graph.My first conclusion is that Virginia had the largest population in both 1650 and 1750. Another conclusion from the graphs is that in 1650 not all of the 13 colonies existed. There was only 8 colonies. My last conclusion is that in 1650 Delaware was the least populated state although in 1750 Georgia became the least populated.
There are many conclusions I can draw from the two graphs. One conclusion is that Virginia was dominantly the largest populated colony in both 1650 and 1750. Also, Rhode Island remained the smallest populated colony in 1650 and 1750. Another conclusion that I can draw from these graphs is that in 1650 New York and Connecticut were exactly the same level in population. However, in 1750 Connecticut increased more in population than New York with a difference of 76,699 people.
My conclusion in both of 1650 and 1750 you will find that Virginia has the highest population. As you can in 1750 five more colonies formed. Almost the whole east cost was formed in 1750. Georgia had the least in 1750 and Delaware had lowest in 1650. The population went up in each colony by at least 50 percent. Those are my conclusions of the pie graph.
My conclusion in both of 1650 and 1750 you will find that Virginia has the highest population. As you can in 1750 five more colonies formed. Almost the whole east cost was formed in 1750. Georgia had the least in 1750 and Delaware had lowest in 1650. The population went up in each colony by at least 50 percent. Those are my conclusions of the pie graph. -Kayla
My first conclusion is that Virginia had the largest population in both 1650 and 1750. My second conclusion from the graphs is that in 1650 not all of the 13 colonies existed in 1650. My last conclusion is that in 1650 Delaware was the least populated state but in 1750 Georgia became the least populated state.
ReplyDeletegilbert
I believe that Delaware had the fewest people living their because in 1650 and 1750 delaware had the least population. Also I believe Virginia had the biggest population of the original colonies as it has the highest population in 1650 and 1750. Even though New York and Connecticut had the same population in 1650, I believe people migrated to Conneticut than New York because in the 1750’s it had a bigger population than New York.
ReplyDeleteMike
There are many conclusions you can draw from these two graphs. One conclusion you can draw from these graphs is that the population increased a lot from 1650 to 1750. Also, in that hundred year span five more colonies had settled. The Colonies were North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. One last conclusion I can make is that Connecticut’s population got 27 times bigger between that hundred year span. These are three great conclusions that you can draw from these two graphs.
ReplyDeleteWill
From these two pie graphs I can tell that in 1750 there were more colonies formed. I can also conclude that the colonies from 1650 have grown in the 100 years. I can also say that Virginia still has the most population. Also, Delaware is not the lowest population is 1750. This is what I can conclude from these two graphs.
ReplyDeleteRaymond
From the time period 1650-1750, more colonies were formed. All of the colonies filled with more people. Since all the colonies got bigger in population and more colonies formed, the United States became popular and more people came and settled in one of the thirteen colonies. Also, it probably was easier to work, and live in the United States. Every other country was ruled by a king or queen who made it hard to live, especially if the ruler was strict and forced you to pay taxes and demanded hard, painful orders.
ReplyDeleteMarty
In these graphs I can conclude that Virginia had stayed the same as having the biggest population over the 100 years. Another thing I can conclude is that there were many more colonies in 1750 then 1650. Also that the colonies population had gone up from 1650 at least 50 percent. This is what I can conclude about these two graphs.
ReplyDeletefabio
There are a few conclusions I can draw from comparing these two graphs. First, many more colonies were started in between 1650 and 1750. Also, Virginia still maintains the most amount of people in both graphs. Also, Massachusetts still has the second most amount of people, which is weird because Massachusetts is one of the smallest states in present day. Delaware grew to nearly 150 times its original amount in 100 years! The population of New England went from 21,800 in 1650 to 360,000 in 1750. Those are the conclusions I can draw from comparing this to graphs.
ReplyDeleteLauren
One conclusion I could draw from the pie graph is that the population usually gets higher. Over the 100 years all of the colonies grew in population. Also the new states had a lot to. Another conclusion I could draw is that the very first colonies had more than the newer one. The 5 most populated colonies in the graph are the very first ones. A final conclusion I could draw from it is that combined the northern states have more than the southern states. If you add all of the populations of the northern states and then the southern states, the northern has more. In conclusions those are 3 conclusions I got.
ReplyDeleteTony
There are many conclusions that can be made from this graph. One conclusion I can make from this graph is that many new settlers had come because there were many new states and the population had increased in the colonies that were already there. A second conclusion I can make is that Massachusetts and Virginia had divided up into other states because their population decreased. A third conclusion I can make is that Connecticut was founded after 1650 because Connecticut was not on the population in 1650 graph. These are three conclusions I made from this graph.
ReplyDelete--Taylor
I can draw many conclusions from this graph. For example, there were a lot more colonies in 1750 then there was in 1650. This also means that the population was a lot grater at this time. The population went up in each colony by at least 50 percent. For both charts Virginia remains the colony with the highest population. Many more colonies were established resulting in a much higher population.
ReplyDeleteKelly
in these two graphs i conclude that in the 1750s there were more colonies. i also see that in both of them Virginia continued to be the nlargest population. i also noticed that in the old days New York was one of the smallest colonies and now it has i think the largest population in the united statess.
ReplyDeleteHECTOR :]
I am able to draw many conclusions from this graph. One conclusion I can draw is that in both 1650 and 1750 had the highest population. Also, Massachusetts had the highest populations in the two years. Finally, Georgia had the least in 1750 and Delaware had lowest in 1650. I drew many conclusions from these graphs.
ReplyDeleteRicky
There are more people living in the time period of 1750 than in 1650. Many people wanted to find new land but in 1650 many of the people died on the journey. In 1750 the boats were all travelling to different places so there could be more people on the boats so less people would die and more would survie.
ReplyDeleteBrenden
Alot of conclusions can be explained using these 2 graphs. One of the is that the population in all colonies rose a dramatic amount in the 100 year span. Delaware had the least amount of people in 1650 and 1750. It probably wasn't discovered as fast as all the other colonies. Viginia was the most populated out of all the colonies. This is probably because of the settlers in Jamestown. It might have also boomed because of the search of gold. Those are my conclusions of these 2 graphs.
ReplyDeleteRyan
There are many conclusions I can draw from these two population graphs. One conclusion I can draw is that over the course of one hundred years, Massachusetts has stayed one of the most populated areas. New Hampshire was one of the smallest populated area throughout one hundred years. New York and Connecticut both had the same population in 1650, but in 1750 Connecticut ahs a bigger population. These are some of the conclusions I have drawn while looking at this graph.
ReplyDeleteAlyssa
You can tell many things from both graphs. One change you can tell is how much the population went up. For example, Delaware used to have the smallest population with 200 in the 1650s’, in the 1750s’ it had 28,700 for its population, that’s a 28,500 difference! In the 1750s’, Georgia has the smallest population and Virginia had the largest, in the 1650s’, Georgia wasn’t even in the 13 colonies. Also, more colonies were added on. Those are a few things you can tell from the graphs.
ReplyDelete-Emily
There are many conclusions that can be drawn from the colonies population in 1650 and 1750.One obvious conclusion that can be drawn is that 100 years after 1650 they founded more states. This happened because the population starting growing so it got crowded and they figured out they needed more room. They also did because over time they probably got braver. Another conclusion you can draw is that the population increased greatly. This happened because they were thriving greatly. Also more and more colonials kept coming to the new world.
ReplyDeleteHannah
I can draw many conclusions from these two graphs. For example, in 1750 many more people must have come to the “New World” because many new states were formed. Maybe this happened because the farming as so good here. Also, Massachusetts had the second most populated state in 1750 so maybe many people settled here because it was freer than the southern states; they could probably follow their own religion there. I think Virginia was the most populated state in 1750 because it had the best farming area. There are so many conclusions I could draw from this graph.
ReplyDeleteKatie
One conclusion I can make from these two graphs is that in 1650 Connecticut and New York had equal population but in 1750 New York increased is population even more then Connecticut did. Also by the 1750’s seven more colonies were added that had not been there in the past. One conclusion I can get from comparing the two graphs is that in both graphs Virginia had the largest population.
ReplyDeleteMADDIE
Three conclusion’s that I can make are both graphs were at its highest population. Second conclusion I can make is that Virginia is at its highest population in both graphs. Last conclusion is that Georgia is the lowest out of all the states.
ReplyDelete-JoE
There are many comparisans you can make between the 1650s and 1750s. There were a lot more people in the 1750 than the 1650. Virginia still had the largest populationin the 1650 to the 1750. The population more than doubled in the 100 years. Every state atleast doubled .Those are all the comparisans.
ReplyDeleteriley
There are many conclusions you can draw from the population graph.My first conclusion is that Virginia had the largest population in both 1650 and 1750. Another conclusion from the graphs is that in 1650 not all of the 13 colonies existed. There was only 8 colonies. My last conclusion is that in 1650 Delaware was the least populated state although in 1750 Georgia became the least populated.
ReplyDeletegilbert
There are many conclusions I can draw from the two graphs. One conclusion is that Virginia was dominantly the largest populated colony in both 1650 and 1750. Also, Rhode Island remained the smallest populated colony in 1650 and 1750. Another conclusion that I can draw from these graphs is that in 1650 New York and Connecticut were exactly the same level in population. However, in 1750 Connecticut increased more in population than New York with a difference of 76,699 people.
ReplyDelete-Daisy
My conclusion in both of 1650 and 1750 you will find that Virginia has the highest population. As you can in 1750 five more colonies formed. Almost the whole east cost was formed in 1750. Georgia had the least in 1750 and Delaware had lowest in 1650. The population went up in each colony by at least 50 percent. Those are my conclusions of the pie graph.
ReplyDeleteMy conclusion in both of 1650 and 1750 you will find that Virginia has the highest population. As you can in 1750 five more colonies formed. Almost the whole east cost was formed in 1750. Georgia had the least in 1750 and Delaware had lowest in 1650. The population went up in each colony by at least 50 percent. Those are my conclusions of the pie graph.
ReplyDelete-Kayla